Rajinikanth’s Coolie Sparks Debate on Real Locations vs Green Screen in Modern Filmmaking
With Superstar Rajinikanth’s Coolie set for a grand release next week, the buzz surrounding the film is stronger than ever. Directed by Lokesh Kanagaraj, the film has become a hot topic not just for its scale, but for its bold production choices.
In a recent viral interview, Lokesh revealed that Coolie will feature minimal CGI, as the team deliberately chose to shoot the film in real locations. At a time when many big-budget films rely heavily on green screens and artificial sets, this decision stands out—especially with Rajinikanth, at the age of 74, leading the way with intense on-location shoots.
The director’s comments have ignited discussions across social media. Viewers are increasingly frustrated with the overuse of VFX in recent years, which often makes films feel artificial. Audiences are now discerning enough to spot the difference between authentic visuals and digital environments—and they’re leaning toward the former.
Many producers argue that rising costs and VFX delays are impacting release schedules, sometimes even causing penalty payouts to OTT platforms. Meanwhile, several stars prefer to shoot indoors to avoid public disruption, but fans are pointing out that if Rajinikanth can manage crowd control and logistics on real locations, others surely can too.
An example that supports this view is Sekhar Kammula’s Kubera, which was filmed extensively in the streets of Mumbai. The film’s real-world setting brought gritty authenticity and immersive realism, resonating more deeply with viewers.
Today, the challenge for filmmakers is to balance technological advancement with storytelling integrity. While CGI has its place, the emotional connection and visual realism of old-school filmmaking—rooted in real environments—still create the most lasting cinematic impressions.
